Search for: "State v. David" Results 6021 - 6040 of 13,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Superfluous instruction Appellant Michael David Brochu was indicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County on 30 counts stemming from the alleged sexual abuse of an eight-year-old boy, “D.G. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am by Schachtman
United States Food and Drug Admin., Civ. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am by David
by David Hricik Over on the main page, Dennis has done a good job laying out the court’s “analysis” in Versata v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:02 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Bloomberg BNA (subscription required), David Faigman contends that the Court’s recent decision in Glossip v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 2:04 pm
Yet I can’t see any reason why, for example, one would believe judges would be especially good at figuring out the right balance between the acknowledged state interest in preserving human life and the “fundamental right” to terminate pregnancy, as the Supreme Court has been doing since Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 30 June 2015 judgment was handed down by Sir David Eady in the cases of Ma v St George’s Healthcare Trust ([2015] EWHC 1866 (QB)). [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
  Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Fifty years ago, in a landmark judgment (New York Times v Sullivan), the United States Supreme Court constitutionalised defamation law. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
 They could identify the worst of the worst.Enter David Baldus and Company. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Hill, David Bier discusses the Court’s “other big decision on marriage” – its ruling in Kerry v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
  The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]