Search for: "State v. House" Results 6021 - 6040 of 28,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
The initiative would amend the California Constitution to require that basically any new taxes or fees obtain both a two-thirds vote in both houses of the Legislature as well as approval by the voters in a referendum. [read post]
” The above-noted HB589 was put on hold due to the Shelby County v Holder decision pending before the US Supreme Court in 2013, which ultimately gutted many fundamental protections offered by the Voting Rights Act 1965. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:05 pm by Ron
  More In-House Lawyers Question the Billable Hour by ACC President & CEO Veta T. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:26 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The son used the hoverboard and left it in the house and it caught on fire, destroying the house. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:09 am
Governor, it is “only when a legal, not a mere political, issue arises touching upon the existence or extent of a legal right that Article 131 is attracted” (citing State of Rajasthan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
City residents administratively appealed the City zoning adjustment board’s approval to the City Council, arguing in relevant part that the project’s “unusual size, location, nature and scope will have significant environmental impact on its surroundings” as it would be “one of the largest houses in Berkeley, four times the average house size in its vicinity, and situated in a canyon where the existing houses are of a much smaller scale. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
As adopted, the Act does not include a proposed amendment that would have effectively overturned the Supreme Court’s 1995 decision in Gustafson v. [read post]