Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 6021 - 6040 of 19,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, to the extent Shubaderov and Egorov seek an award of treble damages in the context of the legal malpractice cause of action, it fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Pszeniczny v Horn, 193 AD3d 1091; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs then cleverly argued that a picture can be equivalent to a word mark, as in Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Andrew Appel
I’ll bet that Secretary of State Raffensperger now appreciates why the Federal Court forced him to stop using those DRE machines (Curling v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
™  In State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In any event, plaintiff failed to state a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 against Berkowitz. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm by Mark Movsesian
Strict scrutiny applies in many free exercise cases, for example, notwithstanding Employment Division v. [read post]