Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 6041 - 6060 of 12,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 6:22 am by Alexander Tsesis
According to Balkin’s perspective, the effect of civil rights groups on our understanding of the Constitution is reflected in cases like Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
EPA in 1980, and the Supreme Court reaffirmed this interpretation of the Act in Whitman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
There were "impeach Earl Warren" signs throughout the South after the Court handed down Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:10 pm
Here's a dramatic story about the career of the late Professor Bill Murphy, via Eric Muller.... [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 12:47 pm
Today the Court of Appeal decides the fate of $331 million held by the State of California. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 4:50 pm
The election is over but the IP case lives on.... [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:57 am by Contributor
Fournier, 2010 ONSC 2126 (CanLII), Brown J. ultimately denied this motion. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
  The Court ruled last term in Miller v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
  That whole "looking for kiddie porn" thing is -- to put it mildly -- super fraught with danger, wholly apart from its many other unsavory aspects.Lest anyone believe that these things aren't super easy to discover, Justice Brown's opinion goes into detail about the automated system that apparently thousands of police officers are using every single day to find people sharing kiddie porn:"In August 2014, Vacaville police detective Jeffrey Datzman was… [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Kasrawi and me, quite frankly, is that he's more brown than I am -- which I suspect might play some role in why Officer Pardue had a "hunch" that Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
"The Court of Appeals cited Gavigan v McCoy, 37 NY2d 548, Niebling v Wagner, 12 NY2d 314, and Mandle v Brown, 4 AD2d 283, affirmed 5 NY2d 51, as cases demonstrating the proposition that an employee cannot achieve a higher grade or salary by being assigned or engaging in out-of-title work "because this would violate the fundamental civil service tenet of advancement through competitive examination. [read post]