Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 9,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm by The Legal Blog
But the State, its corporations, instrumentalities and agencies are bound to adhere to the norms, standards and procedures laid down by them and cannot depart from them arbitrarily. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
For example, in Clift v City of Syracuse, 45 AD2d 596, the Appellate Division ruled that if an employee was refused permission to use his or her leave credits and was subsequently terminated, the individual was entitled to payment for his or her unused vacation accruals.Another decision, Degnan v Constantine, 189 AD2d 423, illustrates the strict construction courts generally give to regulations involving the forfeiture of leave credits.Degnan, a State Trooper, was eligible… [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:33 am by Michael O'Hear
 For Scalia, criminals don’t “count” — at least not in any meaningful way that the law is bound to respect. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:39 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 For Scalia, criminals don’t “count” — at least not in any meaningful way that the law is bound to respect. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:01 am by Hillary A. Frommer
Without that determination, the court was not bound by the Family Court’s determination, and it refused to consider it. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 2:35 pm by Ilya Somin
State courts are no less bound by the federal Constitution than other state government employees, and should be no less subject to injunction when they violate constitutional rights - or threaten to do so. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
One topical example: the leaked draft Supreme Court opinionpurporting to overrule Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
  Moreover, there is already an indication of potential conflict in recent cases filed in the United States in which these issues have been raised (Licea v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:14 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court will say about civil marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The authorities and rights of the monarch were personal, as were the ties of fidelity and service that bound individuals to the monarch, and vice versa. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Unless the publication of images of the princess engaged in her private life contributed to a debate of general interest, they were out of bounds. [read post]