Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 4:09 pm
First, a de novo appeal can be filed and heard by the superior court, or as illustrated in the recent case of Martin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby) and LGBTQ (Bostock v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:22 am
http://bit.ly/cVHMz1 Court Grants Expedited Discovery Against Yahoo to Discover Identity of John Doe Defendants - http://bit.ly/9I7Hgu Delaware Superior Court Adopts eDiscovery Rules - http://tinyurl.com/28zxe6w Draft Alberta Rules of Court Now Available - http://tinyurl.com/2eefqzn DU Law Review: Mandating Reasonableness in a Reasonable Inquiry - http://bit.ly/cib5gL E-Discovery at Issue in Case Involving Anna Nicole Smith's Mom -… [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 11:44 am
The trial court denied the bus company’s motion for summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals granted interlocutory review. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
US v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
The defendant on appeal cited to the unpublished Third Circuit opinion Court, Parker v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:42 pm
Supreme Court in Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
CornelioIn a January 7, 2009 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cornelio v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm
The Superior Court had already determined Bill 5’s constitutionality. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:42 am
The trail court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiff appealed this decision. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
The federal district trial court in New Jersey granted summary judgment in favor of the employer. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
Superior Court -- California's Second District Court of Appeal grapples with hard facts that made bad law. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Eisenberg v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
The federal district court found that the juror's tweets did not warrant the granting of a new trial because they "`were nothing more than harmless ramblings having no prejudicial effect'" on the original trial. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
Were things any different in that respect under Chief Justice Vinson, and if so, do you have any views about whether either mode of decision-making is superior to the other? [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
Superior Court (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 238, 242.) [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:38 am
The court granted the motion to dismiss. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
