Search for: "Opened in Error" Results 6041 - 6060 of 10,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Considering the fact that the examination file wrappers are open to public inspection, an examin [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 8:39 am by admin
  It’s always a good idea to obtain your free report annually (www.annualcreditreport.com) and review it just to make sure there are no errors on it. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:00 am
The Notice gives the impression that it is a pre-announcement of changes to come in view of the many open ends. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 And this is an open and shut Reg 8(2) case, isn’t it? [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 And this is an open and shut Reg 8(2) case, isn’t it? [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 10:15 pm by Sean Hanover
X requested to re-open his underlying removal order in San Antonio Texas immigration court, based on lack of notice, was denied.2. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm by Schachtman
In a recent law review article, two University of Virginia law professors question whether expert evidence should be subject to its own exclusionary rules. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm by Ritika Singh
Such decisions should also be subject to continuing scrutiny, including retrospective analysis, to ensure that any errors are corrected. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
 Back in July of this year, in "Small errors, not many people affected -- or are there hidden consequences?" [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
Minorities will benefit because credit reports in the hiring process are disproportionately used to disqualify people of color from open positions. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Do you meet it with negativity or an open mind? [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:09 am by Nassiri Law
When an employer has illegally fired an employee for impermissible reasons (such as the reporting of sexual harassment) – they often attempt to cover up their actions by claiming the employee was under performing or made some critical error related to their job. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Harmless error tests that let judges say, Wouldn't have changed anything.or Might not have changed anything.orBut he should have said that before.orFuck you.Which is what they all are.And after all, Congress enacted AEDPA which says that federal courts can't correct the constitutional errors of state courts unless they're really really really obvious and gross constitutional errors. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 10:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Castanon proceeded to "represent" Garza throughout trial, making an opening statement and closing argument and even examining witnesses. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:42 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The debt collection case cannot be resolved favorably for the defendant based solely on special exception without the plaintiff being given an opportunity to amend and thereby correct the error. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:48 pm by Daniel Richardson
 Rather, applicants carried a much higher burden of showing it was reversible error. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
Figuring out what works takes trial and error, an open mind, and some experimentation. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  24 million/month, we don’t catch all errors; the public helps as well. [read post]