Search for: "R. B."
Results 6041 - 6060
of 55,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
There is a reciprocal rule for respondents at Rule 5(b)(xiii). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
Os valores foram fixados em R$ 4 mil por danos morais e R$ 48,69, a título de danos materiais. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
The trial court refused to certify a Rule 23(b)(3) class, recognizing that individual issues predominated over any common ones. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
DROITS ET LIBERTÉS — droits et libertés fondamentaux — réunion pacifique — manifestation — alinéa 1 g) sous-paragraphe 29 du Décret concernant l’ordonnance de mesures visant à protéger la santé de la population dans la situation de pandémie de la COVID-19 — couvre-feu — articles 123 paragraphe 8 et 139 de la Loi sur la santé publique — avis… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 7:00 pm
Historically, when it came to broadband Internet service, FCC efforts to craft Open Internet rules and policies drew a clear line between (a) fixed/wireline providers and (b) mobile providers. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:04 pm
(b) In the cases of a defendant (1) who meets the criteria in subsection (a); and (2) for whom the statutorily required minimum sentence is at least 5 years, the offense level applicable shall not be less than 17.http://feeds.feedburner.com/westcoastcriminaldefensestrikeforce [read post]
24 May 2020, 9:30 pm
R. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:36 am
R. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:11 pm
R. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
z b? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:03 am
Böttner, Anwaltskanzlei aus Hamburg und Neumünster. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 5:17 pm
"N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(16) provides that in addition to entering an order prohibiting a defendant found to have committed an act of domestic violence from possessing a firearm, a "court may also issue an order prohibiting the defendant from possessing any other weapon enumerated in subsection r. of N.J.S.A. 2C:39-1. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:45 pm
Attorney Christopher R. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:17 pm
One of my favorite bloggers, Houston DWI attorney Paul B. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:16 pm
B adds that Farah Fawctt Major must be stamping her foot.I read somewhere that one reason why Kissinger and Nixon wanted the opening to China was to distract attention from the fact that they'd just lost a war.Update: My friend Joel John (oops, pardon!) [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
The issue was whether a) the Judges had correctly interpreted R (Boxall) v Waltham Forest LBC 21 December 2000 (2001) 4 CCL Rep 258 and b) whether the test in Boxall should be modified in the light of current circumstances and the recommendations in Jackson LJ's review of civil litigation costs. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
The issue was whether a) the Judges had correctly interpreted R (Boxall) v Waltham Forest LBC 21 December 2000 (2001) 4 CCL Rep 258 and b) whether the test in Boxall should be modified in the light of current circumstances and the recommendations in Jackson LJ's review of civil litigation costs. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:46 am
Mississippi and North Carolina are the only two states in which “alienation of affections” claims are regularly brought; under this tort — which was once recognized almost everywhere in the United States — spouse A can sue spouse B’s lover for “alienating the spouse’s affections” and undermining or destroying A’s and B’s marriage. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Additionally, even if relevant under N.J.R.E. 404(b), such evidence must nevertheless survive the crucible for all relevant evidence: “relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of (a) undue prejudice, confusion of issues, or misleading the jury or (b) undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
See also Rules 7.1(a) and 7.5(b) [read post]
