Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 11,006
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:21 pm by Schachtman
” RMSE3d at 582 n.93; id. at 582 n.94 (“Thus, in Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:49 am by Susan Brenner
Myrthil later stated he believed seizure of the bag was necessary for officer safety. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Justice Smith, writing for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:08 pm by Eduardo Penalver
 The argument that it does will run into Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
This is especially so when the Court recently held that the Property Clerk's failure to commence a forfeiture action within the 25 day period, after a timely demand is made, fatal; as held in the case of Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Smith, decided by the First Department in 2009; Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Seroda, also decided by First Department in 1987. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 pm by James Ridgway
  In big money benefits cases such as Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:40 pm
*Further subject matter dealing with this topic can be found on the In the Media section of this Website referencing the case of State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm by Will Baude
Smith-- Congress can't tell a state where to locate its state capital. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]