Search for: "State v. Character" Results 6041 - 6060 of 7,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am by Rosalind English
At the moment the range of tests for persecution on return is dizzyingly confusing: Refugee Convention – a reasonable degree of likelihood for f (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Sivakumaran [1988] AC 958) Article 3 ECHR -”substantial grounds” (Vilvarajah v UK (1991) 14 EHRR 248) Extradition – balance of probabilities for past and existing facts (Fernandez v Government of Singapore [1971] 1 WLR 987) Extradition –… [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm by Brian Scott
As early as 1918 in the case of International News Service v Associated Press 248 U.S. 215 the US Supreme Court has held that there can be no copyright in facts or 'news of the day'.Courts have been reluctant to afford literary copyright to titles, characters and news headlines. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:06 pm by Christopher Bird
Each week at Wise Law Blog, we review recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.R. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:51 am
Right to an Attorney The Supreme Court of the United States held in Gideon v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of Pettigrew, Charters states: "He never learned the value of magic. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by Aaron
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:35 am by Barry Eagar
Case: Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wyeth [2010] FCA 1211Judge: Jagot JIn this case, a patent for a sustained release formulation of Effexor was found valid and infringed. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
  In a paper entitled “The Right to Inform v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:11 pm by Christine Dowling
  The Washington Supreme Court today answered affirmatively in State v. [read post]