Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 6041 - 6060
of 29,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2014, 7:05 am
CarveryCriminal law: Level Aaron Carvery pled guilty to possession of cocaine and breach of recognizance. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:34 pm
The Court stated, Where, as here, there is no evidence that the defendant actually possessed the controlled substance, the People are required to establish that the defendant "exercised dominion or control' over the property by a sufficient level of control over the area in which the contraband is found or over the person from whom the contraband is seized" (People v Manini, 79 NY2d 561, 573 [1992]; see Penal Law § 10.00… [read post]
20 May 2017, 11:26 am
" Doe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 8:02 pm
Cantwell v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:37 am
Cantwell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
(N v Secretary of State for the Home Department).Even if extreme destitution can be proved, there must be a close and direct link between the destitution and the actions of the state. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
[Post by Venkat] Buckles v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am
[1] Hamilton v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:17 pm
Penn states that she was denied tenure do to her level of productivity and her visibility in her field of expertise. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
Last month the Supreme Court issued what can only be deemed a landmark ruling, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
Last month the Supreme Court issued what can only be deemed a landmark ruling, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:31 am
United States (1998), more than Staples v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
The Fourth Circuit has just issued their decision upholding the district court’s ruling in Universal Concrete Products Corporation v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, 266-267 [1976]; cf. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
Unlike most law professors I know, I support the idea of judicial elections at the state level as a reasonable democratic check on what I believe should be the expansive power of judges to interpret the state and federal constitutions. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
Some more from Justice Brennan in Garrison v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:47 am
The Supreme Court is asked whether or not a state can use its own retroactive tests or whether they need to use the Supreme Court’s test in judging retrials on the state level. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
See Figueiredo-Torres v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
Seems to me that the same may be true at a 99.999% level, or lower. [read post]
