Search for: "State v. N. N." Results 6041 - 6060 of 21,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1990) (stating that “apparatus claimscover what a device is, not what a device does”). [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 1:03 pm
The bad news is that one -- United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:11 am by Jon Hyman
How then, did the employer escape liability for workplace “N-bombs” in Hargrette v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
Co., 75 NY2d 747, 749 [1989] [exclusions from coverage "construed strictly against the insurer"]; Breed v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:03 am by Joe
In view of the now well-known United States Supreme Court South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 51 NY2d 585, 590 n 1; see Furia v Furia, 116 AD2d 694, 695). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:02 am by Kiran Bhat
” Dennis Romboy of the Deseret News reports that a group of atheists has recently filed its brief opposing certiorari in Utah Highway Patrol Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:29 am by Ilya Somin
 (NA)  Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Texas in United States v. [read post]