Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 57,123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2007, 5:26 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:37 pm
In Calvary Albuquerque Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 10:26 am
Today the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:44 am
" Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear said that the state will recognize these licenses as valid. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:00 am
"Further, said the court, Petitioner's allegations that the Department refused to hire him because of a prior arrest history was unsupported by any factual contentions and constituted "mere legal conclusions, and are insufficient to state a claim. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
"Further, said the court, Petitioner's allegations that the Department refused to hire him because of a prior arrest history was unsupported by any factual contentions and constituted "mere legal conclusions, and are insufficient to state a claim. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 11:00 am
In Lasche v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
In different contexts, state laws define "residence" differently. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 11:52 am
I said it was him. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:46 am
The state-created danger doctrine is well-established in the Third Circuit to provide relief where the government affirmatively places someone in a position of danger that he or she would not otherwise have faced, even if that danger is from a third-party.In Kamara v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:39 pm
Following a five-day bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado denied Plaintiffs relief. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 5:29 pm
The Sunday Indy Star column, Behind Closed Doors, has this item today on tomorrows oral arguments in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 11:59 pm
Georgia, an 1832 landmark case in which Chief Justice Marshall said that state law “can have no force” in Indian country. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
End of story.As I said, both sides have darn good points. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:01 am
Under these standards, the court said that it could not say that the supervisor’s testimony did not support the findings of guilt and declined to disturb the Board’s determinations.As to the penalties imposed, the court said that much deference is to be afforded to an agency’s determination regarding a sanction, especially in situations where, as here, matters of internal discipline in a law enforcement organization are concerned, quoting from Santos v… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 2:06 pm
National Institiute of Family Life Advocates v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
As he said in A v B, “The [public figure] should recognise that because of his public position he must expect and accept that his actions will be more closely scrutinised by the media. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
