Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 6041 - 6060
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2009, 7:44 am
State said they don't because it's a preliminary question. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:40 am
But that is a view of the Constitution that fits with a strong commitment to sticking to the original meaning of the text, and I don't think Kagan is on record or will ever be the sort of judge who says that constitutional rights are only what they were at the time the text was written. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:12 am
Don't I have 24 hours to withdraw my consent? [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 8:51 am
The WSJ even quotes one of my favorite lawprofs, Orin Kerr: "I don't think I've seen yet a case where police stop someone and for no apparent reason start searching through their iPhone," says Orin Kerr, a professor at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
17 Jun 2006, 8:07 am
Jurors are skeptical of claims like this because they understand how the real-world works.The SODDI defense has been much more successful in cybercrime cases because they involve a context which most jurors don't really understand, or understand enough to buy defense claims like Caffrey's contention about being framed by self-erasing Trojan horse programs. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:22 am
That's all I'm asking is just don't kill him. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:34 pm
" Don't fight unless you have to, and if you do fight, fight in a way that the enemy (the victim, victim's family, the government) will not be angry at your scorched earth tactics, unless they are absolutely necessary. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 4:08 am
I don't think they will care that it happened over 28 years ago. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:14 am
Don’t get me wrong. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:59 pm
” In an earlier interview with FOX news, Governor Rick Scott defended the voter roll purge: We found individuals that are registered to vote that don’t have a right to vote, noncitizens and they voted. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
"You just don't make quick decisions. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am
‘I don’t know what Aprio has got in mind, but those are some tools they can use,’ Pera said. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
The defendant made three crucial mistakes: (1) The call-to-action font was too small. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
We Don't Need Your Stinking Constitution (June 3, 2004)6. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:09 am
‘We don’t want the attorney to be thinking about what the judge thinks about them at trial. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 8:07 am
My kids don't know why their dad was taken away for such a long time. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:22 pm
There, the government is eliminating the right to jury trial for "crimes against the state" while expanding the definition of "treason" to include just about anything the government bosses don't like. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:09 pm
The problem, however, is to ensure that changes in the law don't affect legitimate activity, such as parallel importation.We have seen how the pursuit of a just, commendable and unnecessary cause (anti-terrorism) can lead to serious, unnecessary and inefficient erosion of privacy and other fundamental rights of countless innocent people. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
" Dissent: I've looked all over this statute and I don't see an "intelligible principle" anywhere. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 6:41 am
It was a death penalty trial, and the historical southern record on death penalty trials involving Black defendants isn't entirely savory, and I don't know anything about the murder except that the New York Times reporter was most likely exhibiting his cluenessless when he reported this at face value: [Convicted murderer Allen] Snyder was hoping to reconcile with his wife, Mary, and became enraged when she… [read post]
