Search for: "BANKS V. STATE"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 15,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
Auth., 182 AD3d 970, 971; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept. of Health, 159 AD3d 1250, 1252; Matter of Trotman v New York State Cts., 117 AD3d 1164, 1165; Matter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266, 1268; Matter of Cushion v Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 46 AD3d 1095, 1096; cf. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a… [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:20 am
Dimino v Jonathan C. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
And the failures of the United States to protect its own story in its own way may well be quite costly--not in Russia, bit within those states in which the bacillus of Russian counter-storytelling can have debilitating effect on the American effort to promote a rules based international order in its own image. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:27 am
(The case is Kansas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:15 pm
Augustus Hand concluded that he couldn't guess at what might be wrong with a legally constituted bank making loans to other banks and setting interest rates for those loans in Raichle v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Federal Circuit Nightmare in CLS Bank v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:19 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
CLS Bank, which covers the patentability of abstract software patents. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:54 am
(Copsey v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
-substantial-compliance case, State Bank of Cherry v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
CLS Bank Int'l and its progeny), a patent can be invalidated or an application can be rejected simply by (i) making a high-level analogy between the claimed invention and one that has been previously found to be directed to a patent-ineligible law of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract idea, and (ii) stating in a purely conclusory fashion that the additional elements of the claim are well-understood, conventional, and routine. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
With exquisite timing, the Court of Appeals lays it out for us.The case is United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:39 am
Abbott City of Berkeley v. 1080 Delaware, LLC (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1144. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
One of EFF's first major legal victories was Bernstein v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:15 am
Arab Bank. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:52 am
Nat’l State Bank, 161 N.J. 220, 232 (1999). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:24 pm
Molinet v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:01 am
At the same time, the Court will also hear the case of AA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
That is the outcome of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
