Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 36,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
The court said that 4 NYCRR 5.3(c ) of the Rules for the Classified Service, provides that a resignation tendered by an employee of the State as the employer in the classified service "may not be withdrawn . . . after it is delivered to the appointing authority, without the consent of the appointing authority. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:12 am
“The petitioner is correct that reconsideration of the rule is a pressing matter that belongs on the Commission’s current notice-and-comment rulemaking agenda,” Peirce concluded. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
§ 1125(c)(3). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:24 pm
§ 1125(c)(3). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:01 pm
In C. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:20 am
Following the Family & Juvenile Law, I see nothing about the Senate Bill on grandparent's visitation (see my post here on that subject).I also found this under miscellaneous and which I think ought to have importance to family law matters:SB 155 Study on domestic violence programs 1/10/08 Do Pass 1/15/08 Engrossed 1/17/08 Passed 46-0 C. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial… [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:24 pm
The only other alternative I see is for GC to figure out how much matters should cost and then offer that fixed price and no more. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 2:29 pm
More likely to go to a boutique firm because company wants the matter (or portfolio) to be important to the firm. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 12:37 pm
It also doesn’t matter if the third person being protected perceives the threat as less serious than the person asserting the defense. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 8:56 am
In some cases former law school classmates, or former attorneys at Wilmer or other firms that I knew, were available in smaller firms to help on matters. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 2:29 pm
More likely to go to a boutique firm because company wants the matter (or portfolio) to be important to the firm. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
In order to reduce the risk to clients of over paying for matters that may resolve in the early stages of litigation, attorneys can offer flat rates for the different stages of litigation. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 1:11 am
Serengeti Tracker has an exceptionally good one in it’s matter mangement system that also benefits from making evaluations part of the normal workflow process. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:47 am
Disclosure and consent is not required unless: - Non-lawyer will play a significant role - Client confidences must be shared - Client expects that only personannel employed by the law firm will handle the matter - Non-lawyers are billed to client on a basis other than cost NY bar uses “should” but this should be read as “must. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm
I could go on, but this is probably enough of a hair-raising reminder that, in a profession where words matter, numbers matter, too. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 5:12 am
Beyond that, it lays out different matter types and suggests fixed fee approaches for each. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:39 pm
As Kingsley Martin notes in Contract Checklists-does sequence matter? [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, as the Boards of Appeal have repeatedly held, whether or not the disclosure is sufficient, is a matter to be decided on the circumstances of each individual case. [read post]
