Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 17,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2013, 2:51 am
In the case of Wilhelmina Warrick v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am
McPherson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 3:12 am
United States, in which three men were challenging their sentences for selling drugs on the ground that those sentences were based in part on drug quantities alleged in counts on which they had been acquitted, garnered commentary from Margareth Etienne at the Illinois Law Faculty Blog and Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules that law criminalizing encouragement of illegal immigration is constitutional
24 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
” [Quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The legal ground here is, at best, unsteady.An interesting precedent exists, however, in Janky v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
We therefore reverse the judgment and grant a new trial on count two of the indictment. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:44 pm
In the court case Hiibel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Additional Resources: Birmingham man arrested on child pornography charges, June 2015, AL.com More Blog Entries: Morris v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
New York also has one of the highest state cigarette taxes ($4.35 per pack), not counting the additional local New York City cigarette tax ($1.50 per pack). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
During the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
Therefore, Defendants' demurrer as to Count V is sustained.andFor the reasons stated in part II A of this opinion, Plaintiff did not sufficiently state a cause of action for a breach of fiduciary duties with regards to Moore and Perkinson. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
This, said the Commissioner, appeared to be a question of first impression and neither party has cited to a prior decision that squarely addresses this issue nor could the Commissioner find one.Although Minisink cited Matter of Kelley, 19 Ed Dept Rep 499, aff’d sub. nom.; Kelley v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision two weeks ago in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:13 pm
But we have at least three (if not five, if we count Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy) justices who would allow state funds to support explicitly religious activity if awarded on the basis of religion-neutral criteria. [read post]
