Search for: "State v House"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 28,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
A majority of the justices appeared skeptical of claims, made by a lawyer for the House of Representatives, that the committees have broad power to request the president’s personal papers, but they seemed equally dubious in the second argument that the president has the categorical immunity from state grand-jury proceedings that he is claiming. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm
States have the power to determine the qualifications of voters; there’s a plausible argument that includes the power to enforce qualifications, as the Supreme Court suggested in Arizona v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:20 pm
Given that the Secretary of State for Housing has apparently said that whether the ban on evictions would be extended was reliant on ‘medical evidence’, one might start to see a picture coming together. [read post]
12 May 2020, 12:52 pm
[Issues from Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:59 am
V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:52 am
A pivotal moment during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:14 am
And, it gets tougher – during this state of emergency, CMS (the federal agency housing Medicare) has changed MANY of their billing and service requirements. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:06 am
Farmer, John, and V. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
The first of the two cases—40 Main Street Offices, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
On April 20, they submitted a relatively short preliminary report to the Senate and House Armed Services committees, with their recommendations for a pilot program in what appears to be an effort to get ahead of the Defense Department report, or at least influence its drafting. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”The appeals court described the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm
v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction:… [read post]
10 May 2020, 5:04 am
Cessar v Malta App. [read post]
9 May 2020, 7:09 am
Or, on Monday, when the Court of Appeal gives judgment in Arkin v Marshall, the whole Practice Direction might be quashed. [read post]
