Search for: "State v. Word" Results 6061 - 6080 of 40,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2021, 5:23 am by Chijioke Okorie
In other words, it is a requirement that is to be met before a patent application can stand the chance of being considered and granted (or refused). [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm by Russell Knight
“Cooperation between counsel and good-faith efforts by them to resolve disputes without judicial intervention are essential to the efficient and expeditious administration of justice in this State”  Spiller v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:38 pm by vforberger
This proposal, in other words, is just plain silly and not serious at all. 4. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 3:06 pm by Mark Graber
  The word count on each page is, I suspect, between a quarter or a third, if that, of what one would expect in a Harvard University Press book. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tompkins that federal courts must apply state law in diversity cases as opposed to the Swift v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State consumer protection statutes? [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The plaintiff organization (CTPU) sued the State of Connecticut over the state's standards regarding the racial composition of its interdistrict magnet schools. [read post]
Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote a strongly worded dissenting opinion arguing that the majority does violence to the text of the Lanham Act by expanding the statute into noncommercial political speech protected by the First Amendment (Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote a strongly worded dissenting opinion arguing that the majority does violence to the text of the Lanham Act by expanding the statute into noncommercial political speech protected by the First Amendment (Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]