Search for: "State v. Young" Results 6061 - 6080 of 8,793
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Brigham Young University, 108 F.3d 1388 (10th Cir. 1997) (“[a]s a federal court, we are reticent to expand state law in the absence of clear guidance from Utah's highest court, or at least a strong and well-reasoned trend among other courts which Utah might find persuasive, in favor of such expansion”). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
On the other hand, he basically seemed, at least from my perspective, to think that if the court were simply to reaffirm what it did in FCC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:23 am by Carolyn Elefant
Gura took the case from its humble origins in federal district court to a landmark win in District v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
It was estimated by The Chronicle of Philanthropy that $246.9 million was raised from donors in the United States in the first month following the disaster. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm by David S. Cohen
Just in time for the start of the semester, Lakhdar Boumediene, the lead plaintiff in Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
  The trial court recognized that the multi-step procedures articulated by the Tennessee Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  (Which is what happened a few years back in State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:23 am by WSLL
Young, Faculty Director, Prosecution Assistance Program, Joshua B. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  People v Wlasiuk ; 2011 NY Slip Op 09544 ; Decided on December 29, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Third Department  reads like one. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm by Alicia Gay, ACLU
The ACLU is challenging Section 3 of the misleadingly named Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) on behalf of our client Edie Windsor in Windsor v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by WSLL
Young, Faculty Director, Prosecution Assistance Program, Joshua B. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:01 am by Adam Wagner
The words “that was applicable” were analysed by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in Regina v. [read post]