Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 6,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 7:30 am
Either the voters passed Measure 755 in accordance with Oklahoma state law, or they did not. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:53 am
That complaint may add to the Supreme Court’s willingness to hear the state’s new appeal (Brewer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
Chase, a former Treasury Secretary under Lincoln during the Civil War, for having wrongly decided Texas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:23 pm
See Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
“I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters, okay? [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
Chief Judge Smith dissented (NLRB v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm
Two years ago, when a splintered Supreme Court approved lethal injection as a means of execution in Baze v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm
Now she’s appealing it to the Supreme Court, under the theory that the First Amendment protects her right to ask voters for campaign cash. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:43 am
Golden Gateway v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:28 am
Enforcement Update & Priorities Also on July 14th, the CPPA held a public meeting that in part responded to the recent Superior Court decision in California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:34 pm
Perhaps best exemplified by Winter v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:40 am
" The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER) was created to fund plaintiffs' representation in Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm
The judge relied quite heavily upon a 1997 decision by the Supreme Court — Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:07 pm
– A ballot initiative to amend CCPA may be presented directly to California voters. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 2:02 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Back in 2010, Arizona voters enacted the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
In the US, it was found in the 1990s that a prohibition on automatic telephone direct marketing that applied to political campaigning was constitutional: the case is Van Bergen v Minnesota 59 F.3d 1541 (8th Circuit CA). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
The dissenting justices [in Griswold v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 7:35 am
No one thinks that Miranda v. [read post]
