Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
The answer to this question is that most consumers simply just don't know any better. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
Gov't Br. 4-5. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 6:58 am
” “‘I don’t know how many people are going to end up having to pay a significant amount of money out of pocket to defend themselves for faithfully and ethically executing their public service jobs,’ the person said. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm
We've tried to encourage the press to ask some tough questions about whether we are really getting a public safety benefit from throwing all these billions of dollars at prisons. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:06 pm
Perhaps the toughest news to give a client is that the law is not on their side and they don’t have a case. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 6:00 pm
You don’t need any laws passed to be open, honest and fair with your patients. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 6:00 pm
You don’t need any laws passed to be open, honest and fair with your patients. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 5:56 am
When looking over the possible violator's site, don't just look over the visible content on the site; look over the code as well to uncover hidden text, image alt tags and keyword meta tags that may include your trademarked names.Then document your findings. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
The cases certainly don't deny that court-imposed liability for speech by private university students is indeed state action, subject to all the normal First Amendment constraints. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
….I don’t think they are fair. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:13 am
I don't see why they should, but I tend to think that they do. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Part of the problem is that we don't have a good way of judging when any file download is "accidental. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 12:20 pm
" [chortles] IJ Employee 2: "Don't be an energy vampire, Paul. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 6:42 am
It’s just that a couple of hard drives on a desk don’t make for a great photo op. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
Because a large number of states don’t allow such claims, and some don’t allow “an end-run” around antitrust using consumer protection laws, the dissent contented, a large proportion of the indirect purchaser class lacked any valid claims, and thus couldn’t “predominantly” share common issues of law or fact with indirect purchasers who had valid or at least colorable claims. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:39 am
But this doesn't make an Internet ban any less problematic. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
For simplicity’s sake, assume a 3-judge (rather than a 9-judge) Court, with hypothetical Judges Roberts, Ginsburg, and Scalia. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 3:44 pm
module=di...94&format=htmlSome years from now you don't want to be the one to say, "First they came for the sex offenders. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 7:12 am
The panel held that "[t]his is not a case about whether 'a district judge may even hold a hearing on a Rule 48(a) motion.' Rather, it is about whether, after the government has explained why a prosecution is no longer in the public interest, the district judge may prolong the prosecution by … probing the government's motives. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
