Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 9,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 am
Both his peers (psychologists) as well as death-qualified defense lawyers argued that he was simply unscientific. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 3:38 am
There was no well-grounded apprehension of irreparable harm if the matches went ahead;4. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:00 am
Gold v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
In Kaushal v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:03 pm
Elsewhere, the separate challenges in the other jurisdictions of the UK are now well underway. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:04 pm
Supreme court case, Daubert v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:32 am
The high court stated that the Burlington decision interpreted IDEA "... to authorize hearing officers as well as courts to award reimbursement notwithstanding ... [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
See Royal v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 7:23 pm
Madame Justice Boyd summarized the applicable law very well and concluded that the leading BC Supreme Court dealing with this issue(Hudniuk v. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 8:47 am
In Nevsun Resources Ltd v Araya, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a lower court’s decision to allow Eritrean miners to bring an inconvenient forum argument against Canadian company Nevsun. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 6:29 am
In Worsham v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:37 am
The jurors may well (and in the i4i case, obviously did!) [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
The case is US v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:55 am
In this week’s case (Moll v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:07 am
(C. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:10 am
Read the decision at: Veri v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:56 am
In FEI's "Financial Reporting Blog," there is an explanation of the status of this project ("bifurcated") - as well as a status report on the IASB's Disclosure Initiative. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:32 am
Note: The jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus was a core issue of Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
The defendant later filed a motion for appropriate relief (“MAR”) alleging his innocence based on new evidence, as well as claims for ineffective assistance of counsel and discovery violations. [read post]
