Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 6081 - 6100 of 21,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It also”alleges that defendant Peterson Geotechnical Construction LLC (Peterson) was the dewatering subcontractor retained by the condominium’s general contractors, defendants JDS Construction Group LLC and JDS Development LLC {together, JDS). [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
” The Cook County judge was also found to have erred in granting the Water Reclamation District’s motion for summary judgment on claims by Becky Andrews that the district was liable for ordinary negligence based on the alleged carelessness of the engineer who supervised the construction project for the district. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:49 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
In a Maryland negligence claim, the plaintiffs must establish that (1) the defendant had a duty to protect the plaintiff from injury; (2) the defendant breached that duty; (3) the plaintiff suffered an injury or loss; and (4) the loss or injury proximately resulted from the defendants breach of duty. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 4:09 am by SHG
Hernandez is liable for fees under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by Michael S. Levine and David M. Costello
On Steadfast’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court held that Greenwich’s policy was not excess to Steadfast’s and that Greenwich had a duty to defend the sewage suits. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:37 am by Jamie J. Baker, JD, MLIS
The plaintiff, who was liable for costs, argued that defendant counsel fees were excessive and unnecessary. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:35 am by Burton A. Padove
Yeakle’s Sports Bar and Grill, which created a separate test for “duty of care” by defendants compared to “proximate cause” of the injury). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:30 am by Jeff DeFrancisco
As grounds, they averred that they could not be held liable for the plaintiffs’ damages because the defendant driver had the right-of-way at the time of the accident. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 5:43 am by Michael Busby
Attorney’s Fees To effect an equitable division of the estate of the parties and as a part of the division, each party shall be responsible for his or her own attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs incurred as a result of legal representation in this case. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court granted the defendants motion, and the plaintiff appeals. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:14 pm
Therefore, the private copying exception would not apply and, lacking a licence, ZEEZEE would be liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:49 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
  For the defendant to be held liable for its negligence, the defendant must have had a responsibility, or duty, to the victim to act accordingly. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
In the two living plaintiffs’ cases, the jury found that the men had knowingly assumed the risk of silicosis, but at the judge’s insistence, the jury proceeded to address defendants’ liability, and to assess damages, in the amount of $22,500, in the two cases. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:50 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
If the truck driver is an independent contractor, the contracting company will likely not be held liable for the driver’s actions. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:14 am by William K. Berenson
Not only is the person who hires the drivers and hands over the keys liable for their actions, he is also liable for their negligence. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:43 am by Cross & Smith
Suppose that you are injured by a mugger just outside of the defendants retail store, in their parking lot. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:33 am by Newman, Anzalone & Newman, LLP
It is essential that you file on time, that you include all of the legal claims allowed, and that you name as defendants all of the entities and people who might be liable and owe you compensation. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:31 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The Boston Herald reports, the state’s Office of Alcohol Testing is accused of hiding the results of 400 flawed breathalyzer tests from lawyers representing drunk-driving defendants. [read post]