Search for: "Matter of Johnson" Results 6081 - 6100 of 6,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Hank Greely, the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and the director of the Center for Law and the BiosciencesOn a recent episode of the Stanford Legal podcast, Hank Greely (BA ’74), the Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and the director of the Center for Law and the Biosciences, explained why he thinks the Alabama decision is not likely to have a significant long-term impact on IVF. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
We highlight below the independent contractor misclassification and compliance developments that occurred in July and August 2022, but three deserve special mention. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:07 am by Emma Snell
  Finland will begin a debate today which could result in the country applying for NATO membership within a matter of weeks. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm by Richard Hunt
Summer is almost over, but before I put away my flip flops and seer sucker suit here’s a last look at what has been a very busy summer in the field of ADA and FHA litigation. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Data Protection in the transition period”. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
His medical training included a year as Chief Resident and a Fellowship in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
North Carolina, 13-604 (granted at the April 18 Conference, relisted once); Johnson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am by MBettman
Johnson& Johnson, 116 Ohio St.3d 468 (2007) (Court rejected a facial challenge to R.C. 2315.18 in which the plaintiff alleged it violated the constitutional guarantees of due process, equal protection, trial by jury,  open courts and right to a remedy.) [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Johnson & Johnson, Case No. 1422-CC09326-01, Division 10, Circuit Court of St. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) The Supreme Court affirms that flag burning is protected speech under the 1st Amendment. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
-Dec. 1944 and (3) “Conspiracy to Commit All of the Above Acts” (by plotting, planning and conspiring “with each other, with the German Reich, and with other enemies of the United States, to commit each and every one of the acts enumerated in the foregoing charges and specifications”) in Germany and United States during 1944) was lawful, and recommending that sentences be approved) (“The Military Commission was legally constituted and had jurisdiction of the persons and… [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Ryan Goodman
Sponsor: Michael Burgess (R-TX) Cosponsors (38 Republicans): Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY) Andre Carson (D-IN) Mike Quigley (D-IL) Andy Harris (R-MD) David McKinley (R-WV) Bill Johnson (R-OH) Steve Cohen (D-TN) Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) William Timmons (R-SC) Chris Pappas (D-NH) Fred Upton (R-MI) Mo Brooks (R-AL) Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) Eric Swalwell (D-CA) Ann Kuster (D-NH) Earl “Buddy” Carter (R-GA) Mike Johnson (R-LA) Gregory Steube (R-FL) Jim Costa (D-CA)… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
Every now and then we run into a decision that we think is wrong in so many different ways that we call it an example of “spherical error” – that is, error no matter how one looks at it. [read post]