Search for: "Robert Marks"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 10,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
” Slip op. 52 (opinion of Roberts, C.J.). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:02 am
Yes, they did great things – but sometimes they missed the mark. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 6:07 am
Robert Moss. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:39 am
The announcement is being made after the boards of both organizations, led by Robert M. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
I’m not sure why Roberts switched his vote in the mandate case. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Florida Drug Statute Constitutional - Breaking News Update July 12, 2012 - The Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion today in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:07 am
You know, I hear all the time about what a great advocate and Supreme Court practitioner Chief Justice Roberts was. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
1.3 Million Inquiries in 2011 for Cell Subscriber Information - http://bit.ly/NghPEY (Peter Vogel) Protecting Data with WORM Drives - http://bit.ly/ROZMXq (Gregory Machler) Providers’ Safe Harbor ‘Self-Certification’ Not Enough To Guarantee Data Protection-Compliance - http://bit.ly/N8tP7w (Pinsent Masons) Search Public Records on the Cheap - http://bit.ly/PpsBwa (Carole Levitt, Mark Rosch) Social Media Password Law Remains Idle in… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:54 am
In the ensuing furor of how church officials handled the discovery, authorities charged Bishop Robert Finn and the diocese in Jackson County each with a misdemeanor count of failure to report suspicions of child abuse. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:03 am
He gives high marks to the current director, Robert Mueller. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:06 pm
I’ve often criticized law reviews for publishing philosophical pieces that tend to show faculty writing to impress their friends and win promotions, little of which contribute to the bench and bar (per CJ Roberts’ point). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:03 pm
Yet under Chief Justice Roberts’ guidance, the Court has looked past labels and legacy to interpret laws as constitutionally as it can. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm
On June 28, 2012, ALJ Robert K. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Sebelius, or to whether he truly flip-flopped on the mandate or (as Mark Tushnet suggests) he had been the “least persuaded” of the anti-mandate arguments at the initial conference and eventually concluded that it could be upheld. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Sebelius, or to whether he truly flip-flopped on the mandate or (as Mark Tushnet suggests) he had been the “least persuaded” of the anti-mandate arguments at the initial conference and eventually concluded that it could be upheld. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
” Robert Post would say that individualized communications aren’t even commercial speech in terms of the constitutional protection they should get—but they sure seem like promotion, even if one then applies an extra magnitude test as with the Gordon & Breach “disseminated sufficiently to the relevant consumers” standard.) [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:15 am
” Robert Post would say that individualized communications aren’t even commercial speech in terms of the constitutional protection they should get—but they sure seem like promotion, even if one then applies an extra magnitude test as with the Gordon & Breach “disseminated sufficiently to the relevant consumers” standard.) [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:44 pm
Sebelius, or to whether he truly flip-flopped on the mandate or (as Mark Tushnet suggests) he had been the “least persuaded” of the anti-mandate arguments at the initial conference and eventually concluded that it could be upheld. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:04 pm
From his center seat, Chief Justice John Roberts begins his oral summary of the Court’s decision in the health care case: “I have the opinion for the Court in . . . . [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Aren’t (Robert) Lucas and (Thomas) Sargent at the opposite end of the ideological spectrum? [read post]
