Search for: "Robert Thomas"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 10,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Holder,” Chief Justice Roberts says. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:04 am
Here's the PDF of Chief Justice Roberts's opinion (joined by Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:24 am
This is Shelby County, written by Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:03 am
Justice Scalia’s relatively short majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Kennedy, Thomas and Alito) concluded that: (1) “the antitrust laws do not guarantee an affordable procedural path to the vindication of every claim”: (2) Rule 23 does not “establish an entitlement to class proceedings for the vindication of statutory rights”; (3) “the fact that it is not worth the expense involved in proving a statutory remedy does… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:47 am
Employees Still Protected, but Must Prove Company Negligence The Court’s majority, which includes Justices Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas, states that employees who face harassment by co-workers who possess the authority to inflict psychological injury by assigning unpleasant tasks or by altering the work environment in objectionable ways will still be protected under Title VII. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
The closest Justice Thomas comes is citing to Clark v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Scalia and Kennedy. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Scalia and Kennedy. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
” Justice Alito wrote the opinion for the majority, which consisted of justices Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:36 am
Hence when eighteen-year-old anti-draft protestor Robert Watts said back in August 1966 "I am not going. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
Think, for example, of Jardines (Scalia and Thomas join three liberals to declare the dog sniff an illegal search), the Arizona vote case (Roberts and Kennedy join the liberals to declare that federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that persons produce proof of citizenship to vote) or Alleyne v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 10:00 pm
A Former United States Secretary of Education and a Liberal Arts Graduate Expose the Broken Promise of Higher Education (Thomas Nelson), by William J. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
ROBERT ROBERSON, Appellee. 3rd District.Torts -- Indemnity -- Third-party action by lessor of business premises against lessee, asserting claims for common law indemnity and breach of contract after lessor had been sued in premises liability action by lessee's employee who was injured during course and scope of employment at the leased premises -- Lessor's third-party complaint was not barred by workers' compensation immunity -- A third party's claim for common law indemnification against a… [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas, and by Justice Alito in Parts I, II and III. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas, and by Justice Alito in Parts I, II and III. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 pm
After some odd bedfellow-ing in recent Fourth Amendment decisions, the Court returned to its familiar split, with Justices Alito, Thomas and Kennedy joining Scalia, along with Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
Justices Thomas and Alito dissented. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Kennedy, and Thomas joined in the majority opinion. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
In an opinion authored by Justice Scalia, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito joining, the Court held that "a contractual waiver of class arbitration is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act when the plaintiff ’s cost of individually arbitrating a federal statutory claim exceeds the potential recovery." [read post]
