Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 6081 - 6100 of 14,866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by S
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:03 am by Patricia Salkin
The court therefore held that the Plaintiffs stated a ripe claim of intentional discrimination under the FHAA and ADA. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The scheme provided that victims could claim compensation directly from the designated compensation body in their own member state, in certain circumstances. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:09 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Although state and municipal bodies are generally immune from liability for torts committed on their behalf, the state code specifically exempts claims related to poorly designed or maintained roadways from the sovereign immunity the government generally maintains. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
He replied that it would be permissible to state that the person had taken a car without the permission of the owner. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
 All Member States' respective regulatory bodies need to be happy with the documents before the procedure is closed. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:49 am by Gene Quinn
Recently,  the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:13 am by SHG
By any objective measure, the Seventh Circuit’s holdiing in Hively v. [read post]