Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 6081 - 6100 of 14,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
03/24/2008 Order List From the Supreme Court of the United States (PDF 231 KB)Order List Takes No Position in the Matter of United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Second Circuit’s decision vacating his conviction was issued on September 20, 2017 (see United States v Brooks, 872 F3d 78, 96 [2d Cir 2017]) and this case was not commenced until September 2021. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
He relies on three decisions from the United States Supreme Court that, he asserts, employ a less demanding balancing test. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
              The claim in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
United States and its immediate precursor, Panama Ref. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
In Syria, the United States once again launched air strikes against the Khorasan group, a faction of the al Nusra Front, on Wednesday night. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:45 pm
Known litigation in the United States filed by ArrivalStar or Shipping and Transit, LLC (login required). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
  The trial court recognized that the multi-step procedures articulated by the Tennessee Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:39 am by Steve Hall
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that states cannot execute mentally handicapped people. [read post]
This broad and unrestricted directive is not, by its terms or by implication, limited to residents (or citizens) of the United States. [read post]