Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 6081 - 6100
of 12,159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2011, 4:04 pm
In the AT&T v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
One of the problems is that the properties have not been put to their best use, thus causing them to be valued for real estate tax purposes at amounts lower than presumably would be assessed if they were developed beyond their current state. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am
Briefly: In Forbes, Kashmir Hill discusses a recent decision by a federal magistrate judge who declined to wait for the Court to issue its decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Bank v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
In Acker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
In Acker v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Fure v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:57 am
Don’t Wait Until It’s Too Late. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
I decided to read it while I waited for my exams. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:32 pm
FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS: PATTING YOUR HEAD WHILE RUBBING YOUR TUMMY WHILE BEING CRITIQUED BY A COP WITH A LOADED GUN WAITING TO TAKE YOU TO JAIL The California Highway Patrol Manual says FSTs are designed to evaluate a person’s ability to divide his/her attention. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 7:54 am
In the five weeks since the Supreme Court agreed to examine how courts should evaluate the constitutionality of lethal injection, in a case from Kentucky, Baze v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
