Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 6101 - 6120 of 9,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
The Walkerton Health Study notes that, “Between 5% and 30% of patients who suffer an acute episode of infectious gastroenteritis develop chronic gastrointestinal symptoms despite clearance of the inciting pathogens.[35]” There is a strong and significant relationship between acute enteric infection and subsequent IBS symptoms.[36] Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder characterized by alternating bouts of constipation and diarrhea, both of which are generally… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:02 am by Stefanie Levine
District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sweet, J.) that invalidated the challenged claims in seven Myriad patents as patent-ineligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:25 am
" Where, then, does this leave us? [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
This continued the upward trend from 19 per cent in wave 1, 16 per cent in the 2006-9 CSJS, and just 4 per cent in the 2001 CSJS. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am by Dominic Adair
Article 35 of the recast Brussels regulation makes it clear that the UPC can grant PIs because the UPC is treated as a member state. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:47 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether human-engineered DNA molecules, such as cDNAs, are patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:10 pm
Such screening can routinely be made available to women who fall outside of the "over 35" age group whose chances of carrying a DS child are much higher than they are for younger women. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
On a positive note, the MORE Act does not suggest allocating marijuana tax revenue to general fund spending. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:02 am by Stefanie Levine
District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sweet, J.) that invalidated the challenged claims in seven Myriad patents as patent-ineligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 31-7-35 (banning gender-affirming treatments for minors) and Idaho Code § 18-1506C (similar), with Cal. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
., 386 F.3d 21, 35 (1st Cir. 2004)(holding that trial court erred in allowing crossexamination and final argument on expert witness’s supposed failure to produce all working notes and videotaped recordings while conducting tests, when objecting party never made such document requests). [read post]