Search for: "Environmental, Safety " Results 6101 - 6120 of 12,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2024, 5:02 am by Reza Zarghamee and Mark C. Talty
As these efforts move forward and the potential health and environmental impacts associated with biosolids become more visible, impacted landowners and environmental organizations may increasingly turn to product liability lawsuits against manufacturers of biosolid-based fertilizers. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm by News Desk
Finally, KG Catering Pte has been fined $6,000 (U.S. $4,400) in court for multiple hygiene offences under the Environmental Public Health (Food Hygiene) Regulations. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:50 pm by Steven Taber
Council member Sue Lang said lowering the airport designation would not cost any money and would solve safety problems. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 1:59 am
Article 191(2) requires that, under the "precautionary principle", preventive action should be taken to avoid environmental damage. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm by Susan Schneider
, PRACTICAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS STRATEGIES (May, 2014); Food Safety Modernization Act Implications for U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:05 pm by Joe Whitworth
CLARITY-BPA was designed by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Toxicology Program (NTP) and U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Dianne Saxe
Biomonitoring Studies Should Be Used by Regulatory Agencies to Assess Human Exposure Levels and Safety of Bisphenol A. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
They argued that it would undermine environmental protections by restricting the analysis of environmental impacts and public input on project reviews conducted under NEPA. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:44 pm
Testing & Engineering Labs of Cleveland, Ohio has a quarter century of experience investigating and assessing hazardous materials/contamination, resolving environmental problems, and protecting human health, safety, and the environment. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:26 am by Schachtman
Califano, a non-scientist, supposedly relied upon an unpublished report by scientists from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm by News Desk
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.) [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
Some authorities emphasize the impacts of climate change on the safety of individual nations. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Phyllis Entis
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here) [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 7:49 am by Bill Marler
From Farm Gate to Dinner Plate, Fifty Years of Food Safety Failures, now available in digital, print and audiobook editions. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 2:40 pm by Stuart Kaplow
National Institute of Standards and Technology “Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability” (BEES) environmental impacts in 1998. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:26 am by David Hart QC
In effect, therefore, there was no right to Article 8 environmental information wider than that available under the freedom of information/environmental information regime, though it did not make this point in terms. [read post]