Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 6101 - 6120 of 12,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
  But it just struck me as representative of the type of labels and description that were contained in the opinion. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am by Tian Lu
The ruling is accessible here (in Chinese), retrieved from China Judgments Online]The plaintiff’s claim was mainly based on Article 6(1) of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of China (2019 Amendment): Article 6 A business shall not commit the following acts of confusion to mislead a person into believing that a commodity is one of another person or has a particular connection with another person: (1) Using without permission a label identical or similar to the name,… [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Goldman also pointed out the costs of labeling and mandates, since meaning evolves over time. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s decision in Herrera v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010 (1996); Schorsch v Moses & Singer, L.L.P., 60 AD3d 557, 557 (1st Dept 2009). [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, while plaintiffs argue that Margaret Rivera signed a contract which labeling her as an independent contractor, such a contract is not dispositive of the issue (Carlson v Am. [read post]