Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 12,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
Nonetheless, pursuant to CPLR 2001, the exact label for this motion is less important than the fact that it was necessary to correct a procedural irregularity in a just fashion (Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
See Berger v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
But it just struck me as representative of the type of labels and description that were contained in the opinion. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am
The ruling is accessible here (in Chinese), retrieved from China Judgments Online]The plaintiff’s claim was mainly based on Article 6(1) of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of China (2019 Amendment): Article 6 A business shall not commit the following acts of confusion to mislead a person into believing that a commodity is one of another person or has a particular connection with another person: (1) Using without permission a label identical or similar to the name,… [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Goldman also pointed out the costs of labeling and mandates, since meaning evolves over time. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:38 am
See POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:25 am
See Zafarana v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:33 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
(Equilon Enterprises v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Kelley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:32 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Kelley v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:08 pm
The recent denial of class certification in Fosmire v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:09 am
See Dennis v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s decision in Herrera v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
