Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 13,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:08 pm
The case, Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:19 pm
This morning, the Sixth Circuit handed down a new case, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:16 am
United States. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:21 am
See id. at 939–43 (citing United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, the court further ruled that Supreme Court had also properly granted that branch of the employee organization’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint seeking to recover damages for discrimination "for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:40 am
The Wynnes disagreed with the finding and amended their petition, claiming that the tax credit statute, as written, was in violation of the Commerce Clause of the United State Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
"waters of the United States. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:32 am
United States, No. 13-1487: When the defendant has been convicted of a felony and can no longer legally possess firearms, and his guns have been seized by the government, "a court may approve the transfer of a felon's guns consistently with §922(g) if, but only if, the recipient will not grant the felon control over those weapons. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:02 am
And one additional observation: Things are getting crowded in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm
National Security Letter Program Reforms Title V of the new House bill reforms the FBI’s national security letter program in similar fashion as the Leahy bill did. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:16 pm
The petition of the day is: Massi v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:21 pm
” Marina Bay Condos., Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:15 pm
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:03 pm
The defendants petitioned for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court for the $50 million punitive damage award. [read post]
12 May 2015, 7:35 pm
The petition of the day is: Salahuddin v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:27 pm
The petition of the day is: Musacchio v. [read post]
