Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 19,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm
This week saw the publication of the Civil Justice statistics for the Royal Courts of Justice 2016. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
. - Justice Robert Jackson, dissenting in Korematsu v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:15 pm
But we heard nothing about the pending Bluman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Further, since the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
Judgment Justice White, an Adelaide-based Federal Court judge, heard the matter sitting alone in Sydney in March this year. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 12:55 pm
The Supreme Court in a 6-3 vote overturned the landmark decision in Chevron v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:46 pm
The problem was, according to the Court, Gentry was still good law after Concepcion. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
However, the instant complaint, while more verbose than the prior complaint, still fails to state a cause of action for “overreaching, undue influence and fraud” (see Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767). [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am
The district court enjoined the law, and Florida appealed to the 11th Circuit. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:52 pm
It will likely remain that way, judging by the questions asked by Florida's Supreme Court justices during oral arguments Thursday. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Therefore, even if Chief Justice Chase had held in Griffin’s Case, as Trump asserts, that “congressional enforcement legislation [is] the exclusive means for enforcing section 3” (Chase didn’t do so), and even if that proposition were correct (it’s not) or if Chase were right about what he did hold about the inability of courts to enforce Section 3 against someone already in office (he wasn’t), that still… [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Below are a few additional observations.First, I am still stunned that in 2022, five or six Supreme Court Justices still refuse to engage in any equality or equal protection analysis of abortion restrictions other than applying the normal rational basis test to ordinary medical procedures. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:01 am
The Court, per Chief Justice Roberts, ruled against FAIR by an 8-0 vote. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:23 am
Each of these decisions was based on the same clearly erroneous application of the Court of Justice of the EU's Huawei v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:03 pm
Live-blogs and Twitter should be welcomed in court, in accordance with the open justice principle, but not if they get in the way of the administration of justice – and they must be appropriately regulated. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:01 pm
That day, the Court issued a historic ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:18 am
By Adam Bennett This fall the Supreme Court will hear the case of EEOC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am
However, in such a case, the Unitary Patent would of course still remain in force until directly challenged before the Unitary Patent Court. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:45 am
So held New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew F. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:19 am
Is this still news? [read post]
