Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 152,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Under the circumstances the Appellate Division opined that "The penalty of termination of petitioner's employment does not shock one's sense of fairness", citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Under the circumstances the Appellate Division opined that "The penalty of termination of petitioner's employment does not shock one's sense of fairness", citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
So the Colorado Court of Appeals held yesterday in Brookhart v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
As I wrote two weeks after Trump was elected in 2016:What does President-elect Trump care about the most? [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:11 am
Here is the opinion in Medina v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:02 am
Facts Hurbain v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:01 am
Rascal House, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 1:20 am
Abgrenzungen und Wirkungen im Verhältnis zum nationalen und völkerrechtlichen Kollisionsrecht, Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht 139, Mohr Siebeck 2023 (XXVI, 693 p.) [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:45 pm
In practice, this has meant that a range of potentially permissible meanings are left on the table until trial, which often does little to narrow the key issues in dispute. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Tingley v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 11:09 am
This conclusion was further supported by a separate document providing guidance specific to statutes of limitation issued by the Supreme Court of Georgia three weeks later: Simply put, the tolling of a statute of limitation suspends the running of the period of limitation, but it does not reset the period of limitation. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:11 am
The US Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in the case Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am
From Taylor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:53 am
"] In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
Case Citation: Emoji Co. v. [read post]
