Search for: "F. S. v. J. S." Results 6121 - 6140 of 8,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bottom line: Infringement defendant Abbott wins; J&J (Centocor Ortho Biotech) andNew York University lose.Judge T. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:19 am by Beth Graham
All American Life Insurance Co., 307 F.3d 617, 622 (7th Cir. 2002), reh’g denied, Nov. 4, 2002, cert. denied, 538 U.S. 961 (2004) (Easterbrook, J.) [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Dean, 604 F.3d at 1288 (Wilson, J., concurring) (endorsing the harmless error doctrine’s applicability to SORNA). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
At paragraph 13 of her reasons, Ryan J said: My finding that some of the wife’s allegations are fabrications introduces the mental element which turns a wrong statement into a deliberate falsehood. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Breytman v Schechter ;2011 NY Slip Op 50125(U) ;Decided on February 8, 2011 ;Supreme Court, Kings County ;Schack, J. is one of those cases which end with the Judge ordering that the plaintiff may not file any more papers except with the approval of the administrative judge. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:58 am by Máiréad Enright
Cooke J. does, however, go on to discuss whether potentially polygamous marriages, proxy marriages and purely religious marriages can satisfy s. 29. [read post]