Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 6121 - 6140 of 10,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Anne Tucker (Georgia State University), Dana Brakman Reiser (Brooklyn Law School), and Yusen Xia (Georgia State University), on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: disclosures, ESG, ESG Fund, SEC Rewriting the Proxy Playbook: Trian Partners vs. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Anne Tucker (Georgia State University), Dana Brakman Reiser (Brooklyn Law School), and Yusen Xia (Georgia State University), on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: disclosures, ESG, ESG Fund, SEC Rewriting the Proxy Playbook: Trian Partners vs. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The husband offered various explanations for his failure to make timely payments, but he neither applied for relief prior to his default nor stated any reason for his failure to do so. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The husband offered various explanations for his failure to make timely payments, but he neither applied for relief prior to his default nor stated any reason for his failure to do so. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Florian Mueller
A month ago I reported on a Microsoft letter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, asking Judge James Robart for permission to bring a motion to "renew and expand" an anti-suit injunction so as to bar Google's Motorola Mobility from suing Microsoft in Mannheim, Germany, for royalties on patents declared essential to the H.264 video codec standard. [read post]