Search for: "JOHNSON v. THE STATE" Results 6121 - 6140 of 8,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by Amber Walsh
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:31 am by George M. Wallace
The Court's decision, in the case of Curious Theater Company v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Congress expressly stated that SOX and Dodd-Frank supplement existing remedies, so they could not bar the CFO from proceeding (Becker v Community Health Systems, Inc., September 17, 2015, Johnson, J.). [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
  Romney lost the Republican nomination to Nixon, and Goldwater lost the election to Johnson. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the National Association… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am by Eric
Johnson's Warehouse * YouTube Video Impeaches Witness' Credibility--Ensign Yacht v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:29 pm by Charon QC
Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] UKHL 5, [2009] 3 All ER 455 was a claim by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
   Section 254.004(a) of the Texas Estates Code provides as follows: (a) A contract executed or entered into on or after September 1, 1979, to make a will or devise, or not to revoke a will or devise, may be established only by: (1) a written agreement that is binding and enforceable; or (2) a will stating: (A) that a contract exists; and (B) the material provisions of the contract. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As I shall explain in this column, last week’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]