Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 88,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
The “Laurick Rule,” as derived from the final ruling of the 1990 State v Laurick case, is used in New Jersey as a means to lighten a sentencing, allowing relief from incarceration if you were not represented by legal counsel in one or more prior DWI/DUI cases. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:38 pm
Pugsley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 8:06 pm
ACI faculty will provide insights into: • The impact of TC Heartland on jurisdiction and venue • The legal and business repercussions of Helsinn • Sandoz v. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
What constitutes “material” evidence has long been a source of legal confusion and disharmony within the justice system, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s attempt in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:12 am
Pakistan and SGS v. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
What constitutes “material” evidence has long been a source of legal confusion and disharmony within the justice system, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s attempt in United States v. [read post]
Document: New York Attorney General Sues Trump Foundation for Campaign Coordination and Self-Dealing
14 Jun 2018, 8:03 am
Underwood v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 9:51 pm
ACI faculty will offer presentations on the following topics: • Regulatory and Legislative Developments Impacting the Biopharmaceutical Industry • The Impact of Amgen v Sanofi on In-House Patenting Strategies • The "Skinny Label" Post-GSK v Teva regarding Biosimilar Carve-Outs • Litigation Strategies for Challenging Reference Drug Patents in IPRs • APJs speaking on Practice, Policy, and Procedure • A "Think Tank" on State… [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
What constitutes “material” evidence has long been a source of legal confusion and disharmony within the justice system, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s attempt in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:10 am
”Grynberg v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
United States, 915 F.2d 699, 712 (D.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
The Court stated, "Our analysis is buttressed by an examination of the legislative history behind the amendment [to CPLR 306-b]. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
This involved a complicated factual and legal inquiry, under US Federal and Georgia State law, into the effect of these agreements.Gilead prevailed, the priority right was upheld, and under these circumstances lack of novelty of the claims as granted was conceded. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
" Without further comment, here is Breytman v Schechter ; 2011 NY Slip Op 51375(U) ; Decided on July 22, 2011 ; Supreme Court, Kings County Schack, J. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 1:02 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 9:47 am
Local actors seek climate change damages from the biggest fossil fuel companies through state law litigation In the wake of West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:55 am
Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
The Northern Ireland Prison Service Standing Orders stated that prisoners were not permitted to wear emblems outside their cells or display emblems in their cells. [read post]
