Search for: "People v Word"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 17,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
But the key word here is "considered. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:17 pm
” Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
At worst, the blurry words warn of your impending DUI arrest. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:18 pm
Alphonsus Medical Center v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:27 am
It contains more words than the Bible, a lot more. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:27 pm
Paraphrasing the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
., Jr. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:12 am
In the Street v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:40 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
" Legg v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 am
While on the subject of trade marks in the EU, this Kat notices that in Case T-524/13 AgriCapital v OHMI - agri.capital (AGRI.CAPITAL) the General Court has upheld an OHIM Board of Appeal decision that there was no likelihood of confusion between the word sign AGRI.CAPITAL for real estate management, brokerage services and building promoter services, and two earlier AGRICAPITAL word Community trade marks which had been registered for financial services. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am
As a result the ECJ handed down its judgment in September this year.The case of Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd (European Court of Justice) dealt with an application for a trademark by Nestle for a three-dimensional representation of the Kit Kat bar, omitting the embossed words "Kit Kat" from the top of the chocolate bar's individual fingers. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Wheeler and Huston v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 2:52 pm
to people who get too preachy in the workplace. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:19 am
Two Jinn, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:50 pm
In other words, for Black Americans, the American dream costs more. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm
Knowles v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
[For a similar statement, see McCabe v. [read post]
