Search for: "Robert Thomas" Results 6121 - 6140 of 10,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm by David Lat
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan, Fabulosity, Federal Judges, Jane Roberts, Jane Sullivan Roberts, Joanna F. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Joining Chief Justice Roberts in dissent were Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:10 am by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Stephen G. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:32 am by Tejinder Singh
Justice Alito wrote for a plurality of the Justices (himself, Chief Justice Roberts, and Justice Kennedy), setting forth the rule that the right to remain silent must be expressly invoked. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
  Chief Justice Roberts dissented, joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito dissent. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 10:24 am by Howard Knopf
Robert Brauneis - which presumably forms the basis for the litigation. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Over at Concurring Opinions, Danielle Citron plugs Robert Kaczorowski's Fordham University School of Law: A History. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm by Kevin Miles
THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:56 am by Lyle Denniston
L-R: Breyer, Thomas, Roberts & Kennedy (Art Lien) Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for the Court ran only to eighteen pages, but those were densely packed with virtually impenetrable references (for the lay person) to such things as nucleotides, covalent bonds, introns, exons and pseudogenes. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:37 am by Patent Docs
In an opinion by Justice Thomas, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, and Justice Scalia concurring in part, the Court held that a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but determined that cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:31 am
Thomas wrote the opinion, so that means only Kennedy, Scalia, and Roberts are left to have opinions that might come out today. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm by Rick E. Rayl
  To learn more about these issues and why Robert Thomas "respectfully dissent[s] from the viewpoint that sees Horne as the least important and interesting of the 2013 Takings trilogy," read his blog post on the case, Unanimous SCOTUS: There's More To The Takings Clause Than Just "Just Compensation". [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:54 pm by Rick E. Rayl
  If you simply can't wait for our write-up tomorrow, check out the detailed analysis provided by Robert Thomas, Unanimous SCOTUS: There's More To The Takings Clause Than Just "Just Compensation". [read post]