Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:41 am
v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
By Eric Goldman Wolk v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:34 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
The post goes into more detail about the background to this decision and its implications, given the close relationship between law and politics in the US. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
Given Trump's magically evaporating poll numbers, the man himself is quickly becoming an afterthought in the US political discussion (thank goodness), but unfortunately his protectionist trade policy isn't making a similarly hasty retreat. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:25 am
This is unusual given the Court’s general reluctance to refer to international law – and particularly international law that is not binding on the US. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:52 pm
Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
Relying heavily on Skilling v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 5:20 am
Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Scott v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:55 am
 The opinion in US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am
Rule v. act utilitarianism: for rule utilitarianism, we wouldn’t use an individual instance but systemically. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:16 am
Allen v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:22 am
It had to apply the factors set out in cases such as Axel Springer v Germany ([2012] ECHR 227,[89] to [95]). [read post]
6 May 2008, 12:37 pm
Karenev v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am
Given the particular context of police work, this potentially exposes the police to a wide liability for their positive acts. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
" Nixon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:37 pm
[iv] Nichols v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:50 am
Given the importance of these claims in a post-Amara world, the significance of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
