Search for: "WHITE v. STATE" Results 6121 - 6140 of 11,972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 8:54 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm by Florian Mueller
Shortcomings should be addressed and I hope Democrats will be principled enough to do that in certain states. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:35 am by Juan C. Antúnez
By the way, this presumption was reflected (if not explicitly stated) by the 1st DCA in Cody v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:01 am
Supreme Court (below left) rejected the President's claim to such unilateral authority in Medellín v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Stephen Griffin
Edward White in his volume on the Marshall Court for the Holmes Devise series (there is also a key article by Philip Hamburger). [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm by David Super
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:42 pm
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 619 et. seq. (1919). [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
This meant that, even if the White House could keep the Senate in line in the meantime, they would almost surely lose the Senate halfway through Clinton’s first term.What no one saw coming was the speed with which things turned against Clinton. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 5:40 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The activists, the white paper notes, have notched some notable successes, for example in the Netherlands, where in May 2021 the activists scored a “headline grabbing ruling” in Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm by Tom Goldstein
Carhart, effectively reversing a prior decision (Stenberg v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
”   Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]