Search for: "In re KING" Results 6141 - 6160 of 6,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2025, 3:18 am by INFORRM
On 6 March 2025, the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta dismissed an application for an interlocutory injunction in the defamation case of MHCare Medical Corp. v Pike, 2025 ABKB 135. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:53 am by Emma Snell
Protesters holding signs saying “not my King” have been arrested in some cases, as have individuals who have publicly criticized the monarchy. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And … if you act, especially if you act with other people—with other people you admire, who you think are doing good things—you’re gonna feel better. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:37 pm by Jim Sedor
Montana: Legislature Is Rife with Conflicts of Interest – and They’re LegalHelena Independent Record – Jayme Fraser | Published: 7/2/2017 More than a dozen state leaders said it is not unethical to bring bills that would advantage their professions or properties so long as others received the same gain and the link is openly shared. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:49 pm by Chris Castle
 This academic fellowship evidently produced his 2004 article “(Re)Formalizing Copyright” boldly published by Stanford and, in a nutshell, advocating a requirement of copyright registration. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 1:23 pm
The corresponding concept in civil litigation is res judicata: one can have only one trial for claims arising from one transaction or occurrence.In a criminal case, the suspect or defendant has the right to remain silent during questioning by police and prosecuting attorneys. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am by Rory Little
King) that “the conduct of the police preceding the exigency” must be considered; only if the police “did not create the exigency” by violating the Fourth Amendment is their conduct reasonable. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland In the case of  Re Doran (No.2) [2017] NIQB 24 the High Court has found that the decision of the Department for the Economy to publish the names of “natural persons” in receipt of Renewal Heat Incentive Scheme funding was in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
I recently had the following calendar note in a probate case in Alameda County. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
In fact, they’re aided in their Bronson-esque investigative methods by a legal system that essentially puts suspects at their mercy. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 7:40 am by Shannon O'Hare
Cash is king for any distressed business, but this is even more so for an airline due to the high cash burn in running operations. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
I recently had the following calendar note in a probate case in Alameda County. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
In his book On Royalty, the British journalist and author Jeremy Paxman reported that HRH the Prince of Wales himself had once confided about the royal family, “I think we’re a soap opera. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:34 am by Tejinder Singh
Prometheus, does deal with a core issue, subject matter eligibility, but it is a re-visit of the issue presented in the October 2009 term in Bilski, the eligibility of a process. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  Jury unable to agree,  retrial  in January 2009 Gregg v O’Gara [2008] EWHC 658 (QB), [2008] All ER (D) 111 (Mar), King J. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Most of the proposed measures are modest: plugging gaps in the law requiring waiting periods for gun purchases; re-enactment of the “assault weapons” ban; restrictions on very large ammunition magazines; and so forth. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:50 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Now the plinth bears a painted message:  “La discipline est la mère des armées. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 1:41 am
So TMs should neither get extra or less consideration because they're in the dictionary. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Top-30 list includes only one: the late Justice Antonin Scalia.Acknowledging Scalia’s impact on statutory interpretation, Justice Elena Kagan said in 2015 that “we’re all textualists now. [read post]