Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2025, 1:32 pm
In Grady v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Lopez (1995) and United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
But that is also my point: sometimes the very bad people are in power, and the people against whom they will use technologies of identification are the human rights activists, the democratic and non-violent protestors, the Twitter-users planning demonstrations in Egypt’s Tahrir Square. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:38 am
Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
EPA, and North Dakota v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am
” Ward v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm
It probably dealt a serious blow to the entire region, as those hundreds of people suddenly had a lot less purchasing power. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
The Stingray is a powerful tool for law enforcement when used in the proper fashion. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
Problem 18 --New York Telephone Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:42 am
He acknowledges that there is no authority for this distinction, but quotes United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:43 pm
This authority gives sitting judges power over the very people who wish to serve as judges. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:01 pm
Sherbert v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
As a matter of constitutional interpretation, Hoke v U.S., 227 U.S. 308 (1913) seemed to suggest that Congress had the power to block movement of people across state lines for any purpose whatsoever. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Allen v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 1:24 pm
” Actually, there does not seem to be any real risk of that, but the entire argument in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
The case, known as Furman v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
That's why each case is titled The People v. [read post]
