Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 6141 - 6160
of 178,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2009, 12:41 am
Plaintiff's "allegation that if [plaintiff] cease[d] making royalty payments under [a license agreement], ' [defendant] would bring suit against [plaintiff] for infringement and injunctive relief" was sufficient to create a substantial controversy at the pleading stage even though defendant "advised [the declaratory judgment plaintiff] in writing that [defendant] did not 'presently intend' to terminate [a license… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:32 pm
But State Farm's paradigm is clear: all out war on personal injury plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:43 am
In affirming the district court’s full attorney’s fees award, the Tenth Circuit afforded considerable leeway under the “abuse of discretion” standard. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's denied Plaintiff's petition and dismissal of the proceeding. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's denied Plaintiff's petition and dismissal of the proceeding. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
Bryan denied without prejudice the plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions for Defendant’s Willful Spoliation of Evidence for deleting her email account after she was terminated, finding a lack of duty preserve or bad faith on the defendant’s part and minimal (if any) prejudice to the plaintiff. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:36 am
In the court’s view, plaintiff’s criminal history posed several problems with respect to her bid to act as a class representative. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 12:03 pm
Instead, the nation's biggest business lobby was calling on Democrats to fix "America's lawsuit crisis. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
The supervisor’s comments about the plaintiff’s masculinity were wrong. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
In a Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit alleging that the plaintiff’s child sustained permanent injuries to the arm during birth, the district court judge found that the lawsuit was filed after the applicable two-year limitations. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:34 am
Today, I will write about the initial response by the defendant to a lawsuit, which is made by sending two documents to the plaintiff attorney: an answer to the plaintiff’s complaint and a demand for a bill of particulars. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
While Peacock was stopped for a stoplight, Waldeck’s car struck the rear of the plaintiff’s vehicle. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 5:32 pm
“Zantac generics plaintiffs hope SCOTUS Ford decision rescues claims against brand-name makers”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has a post that begins, “The U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:47 am
The plaintiff in the case contended that she was fired because of her husband's high medical bills. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm
The Plaintiff’s lawyer had 16 years experience and claimed 62 hours were spent overall on the file. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Moreover, the panel found that the district court had “undervalued California’s significant interest in providing a forum for those harmed [i.e. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
On April 2, Judge Kaplan granted Chevron’s motion to exonerate the bond Chevron posted as a condition of obtaining a preliminary injunction against the Lago Agro plaintiffs and their agents—the injunction, later vacated by the Second Circuit, that forbade the plaintiffs to seek to enforce the Ecuadoran judgment anywhere in the world. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:10 am
SEALED PLAINTIFF, v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:40 am
The chancery court granted Monster’s motion to dismiss based on the plaintiff’s lack of standing, holding that Section 220 requires that a plaintiff own stock at the time the complaint is filed. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:05 am
.) -- deciding that: (1) DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility failed to prove that it had responded to plaintiff’s request before plaintiff filed suit, and that OPR improperly issued a Glomar response under Exemptions 6 and 7(C) in connection with plaintiff’s request for misconduct records regarding certain law enforcement officers; (2) neither BOP nor plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on question of… [read post]
