Search for: "Smith v. SMITH" Results 6141 - 6160 of 16,223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(a)(5) provides that a declarant is "unavailable" if he is absent from the hearing and the proponent of a statement has been unable to procure the declarant's attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception... [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:07 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition. [read post]
23 May 2010, 9:21 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Kentucky Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than ten (10) years has elapsed since the date of the conviction unless the... [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 7:50 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 1002, the Best Evidence or Original Document Rule, indicates that To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or... [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:55 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
As I have noted on several occasions, polygraph evidence is per se inadmissible in the vast majority of jurisdictions in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 6:21 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 806 provides that When a hearsay statement, or a statement defined in Rule 801(d)(2)(C), (D), or (E), has been admitted in evidence, the credibility of the declarant may be attacked, and if attacked may be supported,... [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:15 am
The court relied on Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
On Tuesday, I discussed the culmination of a recent case in the Ninth Circuit, United States v. [read post]