Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 6141 - 6160 of 8,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am by Eugene Volokh
As it happens, a week before the Florida court decision, an Illinois appellate court handed down a decision in Schneider v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Coppola, 23 A.D.3d 1012, 1013 (4th Dep't 2005) leave dismissed 7 N.Y.3d 741 (2006) (quoting Walker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
Because this is a federal decision, it will hold significant precedential weight in similar cases filed throughout the United States in the future. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit)   United Kingdom Limitation of damages in the Patents County Court (EPLAW) UKIPO issues TPN (3/2011) – hearings in cases of invalidation on relative grounds (Class 46)   United States US General Does 337 apply to foreign trade secret missapropiation? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  The changes further made the novelty defeating acts available wherever they occur in the world, thereby removing requirements related to occurrences in the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Marie Louise
Apple v Samsung (PatLit) Metall auf Metall II – The curious case of free use and sampling (1709 Copyright Blog) Bundespatentgericht confirms no risk of confusion between iMove and IMOVIE (Class 46)   Netherlands Samsung loses Dutch case against Apple over 3G patents as court gives meaning to FRAND (FOSS Patents) (EPLAW)   Spain File-sharing admins jailed for linking to copyright works (TorrentFreak)   Sweden Stockholm District Court: Jail sentence for Pirate Bay… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm by AALRR
AT&T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 285 F.3d 238, 239 n.2 (3d Cir. 2002) (applying Pennsylvania law) (Bexis’s case); Bogle v. [read post]