Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 6161 - 6180 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by David Kemp
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Center for Class Action Fairness Reply of petitioner [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm by Florian Mueller
With the exception of certain kinds of standard-essential patents (for example, cellular standards patents), it's clear that the product will still be sold after being modified to work around the enforced patents, maybe after a minor disruption caused by the need to make those modifications.If products are named in an injunction order, they are only examples of infringement and do not limit the scope of an injunction that is worded like Judge Koh's two recent injunctions against… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
United States, 132 S.Ct. 2492 (2012), and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Royal Dutch Petroleum – an Alien Tort Statute case involving a violation of the law of nations and whether a corporation can be a defendant in an Alien Tort Statute action;  United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" District Court Rules That Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act Suspends False Claims Act's Six-Year Statute of LimitationsDouglas Baruch and John Boese of Fried Frank recently wrote a "FraudMail Alert®" on the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  This long-running litigation involves a challenge by direct purchasers of K-DUR (potassium chloride) Extended-release Tablets who allege that Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In the recent Decision of Parulski v. [read post]